The “only democracy in the Middle East” routinely arrests Palestinian children and detains them with no charges. And when it does often charge them, the children are often forced to “admit” guilt under torture.
And what are most Palestinian children charged with: throwing rocks. Israel’s thuggish, terrorist occupation soldiers are “threatened” by the rocks of Palestinian children.
The debate on Israel in America is changing. Time magazine, usually stupid and apologetic toward Israel, recently published this courageous piece on Israeli abuse of Palestinian children [I will quote liberally, because it merits it]:
Walid Abu Obeida, a 13-year-old Palestinian farm boy from the West Bank village of Ya’abad, had never spoken to an Israeli until he rounded a corner at dusk carrying his shopping bags and found two Israeli soldiers waiting with their rifles aimed at him. “They accused me of throwing stones at them,” recounts Walid, a skinny kid with dark eyes. “Then one of them smacked me in the face, and my nose started bleeding.”
According to Walid, the two soldiers blindfolded and handcuffed him, dragged him to a jeep and drove away. All that his family would know about their missing son was that his shopping bags with meat and rice for that evening’s dinner were found in the dusty road near an olive grove. Over the course of several days in April last year, the boy says he was moved from an army camp to a prison, where he was crammed into a cell with five other children, cursed at and humiliated by the guards and beaten by his interrogator until he confessed to stone-throwing.
Walid says he saw his parents for only five seconds when he was brought before an Israeli military court and accused by the uniformed prosecutor not only of throwing stones but of “striking an Israeli officer.” The military judge ignored the latter charge and chose to prosecute Walid only for allegedly heaving a stone at soldiers.
The boy got off lightly: he spent 28 days in prison and was fined 500 shekels (approximately $120). Under Israeli military law, which prevails in the Palestinian territories, the crime of throwing a stone at an Israeli solider or even at the monolithic 20-ft.-high “security barrier” enclosing much of the West Bank can carry a maximum 20-year-prison sentence. Since 2000, according to the Palestinian Ministry for Prisoner Affairs, more than 6,500 children have been arrested, mostly for hurling rocks.
Walid’s story is hardly unusual, judging from a report on the Israeli military-justice system in the West Bank compiled by the Palestine office of the Geneva-based Defense for Children International, which works closely with the U.N. and European states. Human-rights groups in Israel and elsewhere have also condemned the punishment meted out to Palestinian children by Israeli military justice. Most onerous, says Sarit Michaeli of the Israeli human-rights group B’Tselem, is that inside the territories, the Israeli military deems any Palestinian who is 16 years and older as an adult, while inside Israel, the U.S. and most other countries, adulthood is reached at age 18.
The report states that “the ill-treatment and torture” of Palestinian child prisoners “appears to be widespread, systematic and institutionalized, suggesting complicity at all levels of the political and military chain of command.” . . .
The Geneva organization’s report alleges that under Israeli military justice, it is the norm for children to be interrogated by the Israeli police and army without either a lawyer or a family member present and that most of their convictions are due to confessions extracted during interrogation sessions or from “secret evidence,” usually tip-offs from unnamed Palestinian informers. If so, the practice may violate the U.N. Convention Against Torture, which Israel ratified in 1991. In response to TIME’s queries, a lawyer for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said that under “security legislation” and Israel’s interpretation of international law, no lawyer or relative need be present during a child’s interrogation.
The children’s rights defenders collected testimony from 33 minors, including a child identified merely as “Ezzat H.,” who described a “soldier wearing black sunglasses [who] came into the room where I was held and pointed his rifle at me. The rifle barrel was a few centimeters from my face. I was so terrified that I started to shiver. He made fun of me and said: ‘Shivering? Tell me where the [father’s hidden] pistol is before I shoot you.’ ” . . .
According to the Israeli human-rights group Breaking the Silence, a few Israeli soldiers are alarmed by their own troops’ behavior. The group cites the testimony of two officers who complained before a military court that during an operation last March in Hares village, soldiers herded 150 male villagers, some as young as 14, into a schoolyard in the middle of the night, where they were kept bound, blindfolded and beaten over the course of more than 12 hours.
And now this:
This is the same country that likes to lie about being a democracy and having the most moral army no less. The Nazis used to blindfold and beat up helpless Jews as well. The Nazis used to abuse Jewish children as well.
The Jewish state is the mirror image of the Nazis.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 







You are right. India was an important ally of Palestine and other Arab countries earlier but now India has become a strategic partner of both US and Israel. There has been a great change in Indian foreign policy in last 10-15 years. India has joined the imperialist agenda of US and Israel.
There is not even a small change in Indian policy,even at the time of BJP govt and India still following the policy of Nehru,Menon and Swarn Singh.
you don't see any change in the policy. The congress and BJP justify their shift towards US and Isarel and you are denying even the change. The Nehruvian foreign policy was that of NAM. What happened in case of Iran? Why did Manmohan Singh government voted against Iran in IAEA?
Further, it is true that India had been moving more toward a pro-Israel foreign policy. Though India, like the rest of the world, is still what I would call balanced. It no longer in unconditional support for the Palestinians, but one that plays a balancing act.
Which, of course, is certainly better than just supporting Israel and shunning the Palestinians as the United States traditionally does.