'Hezbollah's Men In New York City' - Instablogs
'Hezbollah's Men In New York City'
Marco Villa , Connecticut: Apr 26 2009
Made Popular Apr 27 2009
United States :

The U.S. government has successfully prosecuted an American of Paksitani descent for offering Hezbollah’s al-Manar television channel as part of a broader satellite cable package.

'Hezbollah's Men In New York City'

Javed Iqbal has lived in the United States for 20 years and is a father of five with a son child on the way. He does not have nor have ever had any involvement with any Islamic fundamentalists groups, and federal prosecutors do not accuse him of any such associations or of harboring malignant views of the United States.

Iqbal’s sole “crime” was that he offered al-Maner as one channel in a satellite package, a package that also included porn. For that he has been sentence to 6 years in prison [prosecutors originally wanted 15, but agreed to a plea] and will most likely face deportation once he has served his time.

How can any decent person not see this is the bigoted injustice that it is?

The low-life federal prosecutor Eric Snyder called Iqbal “Hezbollah’s man in New York City. He did all this to bring the Hezbollah operations to our shores, to allow Hezbollah to have their operations here in New York City. That’s a very dangerous thing.”

This is non-sense. Iqbal can’t even understand Arabic and even if he was a fundamentalist Muslim who wanted to disseminate propaganda, a Sunni radical from Pakistan would have nothing to do with a Shia fundamentalist party. He was not their man in New York in any significant sense. He did not and does not share their views, if they sought him out as someone to deliver a channel it was simply a business transaction on his part.

It is clear what is going on here. Federal prosecutors, who have closed little cases and are eager for a victory in the “war on terror”, have gone after an easy target. Is this man really a threat to national security? Is he really “dangerous”?

How is offering a channel dangerous to New York? And if al-Manar is objectionable, then the government can just tell Iqbal he can’t carry the network [the United States has since banned it]. Putting him in jail for 6 years is beyond the pale and a reflection of the dogmatic and hateful approach the Justice Department has adopted since 9/11.

This is a sad day for America when a citizens of twenty years and a father of soon-to-be six children is locked up for years and then most likely deported because federal prosecutors care more about a badge on their suits than about American notions of justice.

And, for the record, anyone in American can watch Hezbollah’s al-Manar over the Internet as the channel is always streaming live. Is the U.S. government going to put the people who watch it online in jail too?

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Richard
Atlanta, United States
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire
1 Stars
Ben
Beverly Hills, United States
Hizbollah is a TERRORIST organization. And the fact the you people would have supported Hitler TV during WWII is absolutely disgusting.
2 Stars
Sheldon
Philadelphia, United States
Freedom of speech isn't the freedom to say whatever the hell you want. It's also not the right to allow an American villain to say whatever he wants. Freedom of speech is a registered American's right to hold and vocalize an opinion without fear of retribution. Since when was it legal to voice a desire to murder the president?
1 Stars
Todd
Beverly Hills, United States
Great reply ben, i liked it
1 Stars
Peter
Mexico City, Mexico
In the name of protecting freedom and democracy, the United States has given up both.
1 Stars
Todd
Beverly Hills, United States
This guy could have broadcasted Al Jazzera and he could have kept on going, but he is technically dealing with a terrorist organization and that is why he was stopped. Don't bother bring up the constitution or free speech because that was not violated in this instance.
1 Stars
He did not deal with Hezbollah nor made any transactions with it, the channel is part of Free to Air packages, the Poor man added this channel to what he is offering to the customers most likely without knowing that this channel is prohibited in the US.

Any one in north America can receive this channel using a 20$ cheep receiver and some info from the internet.

Breaking the media laws is one thing but accusing him of being a Hezbollah’s man and destroying a family is just ridiculous.
1 Stars
Todd
Beverly Hills, United States
To some extent i might agree with you but ignorance cannot be a reason to prove him innocent. In a profession, a person is supposed to know the rules that he/she has to abide like we need to learn the traffic rule before start driving on the road......simple
1 Stars
Agree, he is not innocent, but my point is he should be prosecuted under the Media broadcasting laws, not as a terrorist.
Add your Comment