
We here at Instablogs report on hundreds of issue, but few hit home as close as this story. CNN’s much-touted iReport ciziten-journalism recently caused trouble on Wall Street due to the network posting false information from a sender.
An iReport contributor reported that Apple’s CEO Steve Jobs had had a heart attack. Within moments of the post, the companies stock began to dip until Apple quickly responded that CNN’s third-party reporting was false, Mr. Jobs was fine.
The stock then resumed its normal trading pattern. CNN has since removed the post, obviously. But the fact that such false information about a prominent American CEO could be posted, without verification, on the website of one of the United States’ and the world’s most reputable news organization raises serious questions about the conduct of citizen journalism: who are the editors and what are the standards?
Here at Instablog this is something that we all most confront if we wish to maintain the high standards and reputation of our forum. Without fact-checking and proper conduct editing, Instablog could be what CNN iReport became last week: a network for falsehood.
The standards to be maintained are simply and obvious, they are the standards upheld by most news bureaus: honesty, decency and thorough fact-checking. As to who are the editors: we all are. It is up to us in the Instablog community to be each others editors 24/7. We must read one another’s posts and make sure that no one is intentionally spreading falsehoods and indecency (i.e. hate speech).
It also means that as public editors we should offer one another constructive criticism. I invite you all to offer comments on my writings and as an Instablog friend, I will reciprocate the honor.
And of course CNN people should now understand that every news can't be allowed, they should ask the reporter in important stories to provide a bot of evidence.
That post is laden with a lot of caution about what a false piece of information could do to the reputation of citizen journalism, here at Instablogs.
When readers must have read the false news about Mr Jobs heart attack, it was not citizen journalism that they relied on, in all probability the reputation of CNN must have made it sound credible.
Building credibility sometimes takes generations, which New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Economist, news agencies like AFP, Reuters, AP, news services like VOA, BBC and a host of others have acquired over time.
We remain a start up, by the standards these organization have reached, but to build credibility, I agree with Marco and we must ensure that false reporting and false propaganda must be countered and stopped from making its way into public domain, if we are to build an credible citizen journalism forum.
Building a reputation takes a generation, damaging it does not take more than a few hours.
Like you say, we all editors... Its our responsibility to make sure that whatever we post is not malicious, hatred,... we all know it.
Let us not flash this young next best thing to happen to us all down the drain.
Its simple: Let us report the news as it happens, nothing less or more!
Like you say, we all editors... Its our responsibility to make sure that whatever we post is not malicious, hatred,... we all know it.
Let us not flash this young next best thing to happen to us all down the drain.
Its simple: Let us report the news as it happens, nothing less or more!
but this here is a serious issue!
but i think, not sparing the CJ the CNN bureau is more at blame for not verifyng the news in the first place!
I think the enquiries it made after it published the news could have been done earlier as well to save its face!
Local Opinions (1)
I totally agree with you that we can never develop until we grow as truly democratic, and that can only happen when we becoming each others editor.
We need to understand that a platform like this can't be allowed to be misused at any cost, and people should help in developing the story with comments and questions.
Global Opinions (7)
And of course CNN people should now understand that every news can't be allowed, they should ask the reporter in important stories to provide a bot of evidence.
That post is laden with a lot of caution about what a false piece of information could do to the reputation of citizen journalism, here at Instablogs.
When readers must have read the false news about Mr Jobs heart attack, it was not citizen journalism that they relied on, in all probability the reputation of CNN must have made it sound credible.
Building credibility sometimes takes generations, which New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Economist, news agencies like AFP, Reuters, AP, news services like VOA, BBC and a host of others have acquired over time.
We remain a start up, by the standards these organization have reached, but to build credibility, I agree with Marco and we must ensure that false reporting and false propaganda must be countered and stopped from making its way into public domain, if we are to build an credible citizen journalism forum.
Building a reputation takes a generation, damaging it does not take more than a few hours.
Like you say, we all editors... Its our responsibility to make sure that whatever we post is not malicious, hatred,... we all know it.
Let us not flash this young next best thing to happen to us all down the drain.
Its simple: Let us report the news as it happens, nothing less or more!
Like you say, we all editors... Its our responsibility to make sure that whatever we post is not malicious, hatred,... we all know it.
Let us not flash this young next best thing to happen to us all down the drain.
Its simple: Let us report the news as it happens, nothing less or more!
but this here is a serious issue!
but i think, not sparing the CJ the CNN bureau is more at blame for not verifyng the news in the first place!
I think the enquiries it made after it published the news could have been done earlier as well to save its face!
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 










I totally agree with you that we can never develop until we grow as truly democratic, and that can only happen when we becoming each others editor.
We need to understand that a platform like this can't be allowed to be misused at any cost, and people should help in developing the story with comments and questions.